<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Translucent - Local Open Government Blog</title>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/articles/public-records/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:43:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:46:01 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Transparent government or Translucent government?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As governments put more and more information on the web, governments should be focused on how to make that information usable to help the public understand how it relates the decision-making process.&nbsp; As noted in this post, <a href="http://www.tuesdaynight.org/2009/06/29/transparent-or-translucent.html">Transparent or Translucent</a>, simply loading data onto websites can serve to obscure how governments make decisions&nbsp;&nbsp;rather than give the public access to how and why those decisions are made.&nbsp; This can result in translucent government, not transparent government.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/public-records/transparent-government-or-translucent-government/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/public-records/transparent-government-or-translucent-government/</guid>
<category>Electronic Records</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Translucent</category><category>Transparency</category><category>Web 2.0</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 12:43:33 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>