<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Privacy - Local Open Government Blog</title>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/articles/in-the-news/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:07:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:45:14 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Medical Privacy should always be considered in responding to Public Records Act requests</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>In addition to federal HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) requirements, the Washington State Medical Records Act, <a href="http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=70.02 ">Chapter 70.02 RCW </a>places strict limits upon the disclosure of health care information. These limits apply to all health care providers, not only to hospitals. This includes anyone who &quot;is licensed, certified, registered, or otherwise authorized by the law of this state to provide health care in the ordinary course of business or practice of a profession.&quot; An example would be EMT services provided by fire departments and fire districts. The Public Records Act specifically incorporates the Washington Medical Records Act at RCW 42.56.360. Washington's privacy protections are thus different from and in addition to those provided by federal law under HIPAA. More information regarding HIPAA is available at the <a href="http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/ ">U.S. Department of Health &amp; Human Services HIPAA website</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2010/01/articles/public-records/medical-privacy-should-always-be-considered-in-responding-to-public-records-act-requests/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2010/01/articles/public-records/medical-privacy-should-always-be-considered-in-responding-to-public-records-act-requests/</guid>
<category>HIPAA</category><category>Medical Records</category><category>Privacy</category><category>Public Records</category><category>State laws</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 08:07:48 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Sven Peterson</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>U.S. Supreme Court to Address Privacy of Text Messages Sent on Employer-Owned Devices</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2010509535_privacy15.html"><font color="#800080">Seattle Times</font></a> reported this week that the United State Supreme Court announced that it would consider whether an employee has a right to privacy when sending and receiving text messages on an employer-owned electronic device.&nbsp;The case is <i>City of Ontario v. Quon</i>, and is an appeal from a 2008 Ninth Circuit ruling (<i>Quon v. Archwireless Operating Company, Inc.</i>).&nbsp;In that case the Ninth Circuit held that an employee&rsquo;s right to privacy outweighed the public employer&rsquo;s right to audit text messages sent from its employer-issued pagers.&nbsp;See our <a title="http://www.foster.com/newsdetail.aspx?newsType=1&amp;newsID=341" href="http://www.foster.com/newsdetail.aspx?newsType=1&amp;newsID=341"><span>2008 news alert</span></a> for more information about the Ninth Circuit ruling.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The&nbsp;U.S. Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in the case in the spring and issue a decision by the end of June 2010.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/12/articles/in-the-courts/us-supreme-court-to-address-privacy-of-text-messages-sent-on-employerowned-devices/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/12/articles/in-the-courts/us-supreme-court-to-address-privacy-of-text-messages-sent-on-employerowned-devices/</guid>
<category>City of Ontario v. Quon</category><category>In the courts</category><category>In the news</category><category>Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals</category><category>Privacy</category><category>Quon v. Archwireless</category><category>Search</category><category>Supreme court</category><category>Text messages</category><category>Web 2.0</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:11:41 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rosa Fruehling-Watson</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Open Government in the News:  Washington State</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Here are recent open government headlines&nbsp;from Washington State&nbsp;-- thanks to <a href="http://www.washingtoncog.org/index.html">WaCOG </a>and<a href="http://og-blogdotcom.blogspot.com/">Og-Blog </a>for finding these.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ptleader.com/main.asp?SectionID=4&amp;SubSectionID=4&amp;ArticleID=24632&amp;TM=55011.97">&quot;<font face="Helvetica">D'Amico wins open records suit against Jefferson County for Commissioner Sullivan's phone calls&quot;</font></a>&nbsp; <em>Port Townsend Leader</em></p>
<p><font face="Helvetica"><a href="http://blogs.bellinghamherald.com/traffic/?p=797">&quot;Records show WWU hushing of information, criticism of student newspaper article&quot;</a> </font><em><font face="Helvetica">Bellingham Herald</font></em></p>
<p><font face="Helvetica">&quot;<a href="http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090628/NEWS01/706289844&amp;news01ad=1">Monroe's business gets done in secret&quot;</a>&nbsp; </font><em><font face="Helvetica">Everett Herald </font></em></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/in-the-news/open-government-in-the-news-washington-state/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/in-the-news/open-government-in-the-news-washington-state/</guid>
<category>In the news</category><category>Open Public Meetings</category><category>Open Public Meetings Act</category><category>Privacy</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Public Records Act</category><category>State laws</category><category>Taxpayer costs</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 13:06:55 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>