<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Caperton v. Massey - Local Open Government Blog</title>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/articles/in-the-courts/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:19:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:34:14 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Washington State Supreme Court Withdraws Yousoufian Opinion</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Update 7/5</p>
<p>What does this mean for other PRA&nbsp;cases?&nbsp; If you have a case at the penalty stage, I'd probably seek a stay because unless the Court adopts the identical test,&nbsp; if you do it now you'll just have to do it again later.</p>
<p>Original Post</p>
<p>The Washington State Supreme Court has withdrawn its January Opinion in the long-running <em>Yousoufian v. Office of Ron Sims</em> case.&nbsp; In that Opinion, the Supreme Court had ruled that the $124,000 Public Records Act penalty award against King County was too small.&nbsp; The Opinion adopted 16 factors trial courts should use to set penalty amounts.&nbsp; For more details on the Opinion, <a href="http://www.mrsc.org/focus/opengovadvisor/opengov0109.aspx">see this MRSC&nbsp;article</a>.</p>
<p>King County had moved to have the Opinion withdrawn after it was revealed that the Opinion author, Justice Richard Sanders, had a pending appeal in a Public Records Act case, where he was relying on his <em>Yousoufian </em>Opinion to argue that his judgment against the State should be increased.&nbsp; In light of the recent U.S. Supreme Court holding in <a href="http://www.localopengovernment.com/uploads/file/WV recusal US supreme .pdf"><em>Caperton v. Massey</em></a> that a West Virginia Supreme Court Justice's decision not to recuse himself violated due process, this result is not surprising.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here is an <a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2009342833_yousoufian16m.html">article in the Seattle Times on the Supreme Court's ruling</a>.&nbsp; Here is a <a href="http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/2009/06/articles/open-government/supreme-court-withdraws-yousoufian-ruling/">post on the Supreme Court Blog</a> about the order.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/in-the-courts/washington-state-supreme-court-withdraws-yousoufian-opinion/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/in-the-courts/washington-state-supreme-court-withdraws-yousoufian-opinion/</guid>
<category>Caperton v. Massey</category><category>Due process</category><category>In the courts</category><category>In the news</category><category>Justice Sanders</category><category>King County</category><category>Penalties</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Recusal</category><category>Supreme court</category><category>Taxpayer costs</category><category>Washington Supreme Court</category><category>Yousoufian</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 09:19:58 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Foster Pepper Municipal Group</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
