<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Media - Local Open Government Blog</title>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/articles/in-the-news/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2011</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:13:47 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 07:33:52 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>Kitsap County Parks Department Takes Down Facebook Site In Light of Secretary of State&apos;s Records Management Advisory</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.kitsapsun.com/news/2009/nov/07/kitsap-official-right-now-social-media-more-troubl/">The Kitsap Sun</a> recently reported that on October 28, 2009, the Kitsap County Parks and Recreation Department&rsquo;s blog (launched September 8, 2009 and hosted on a County intern&rsquo;s <a title="Facebook site" href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/Bremerton-WA/Kitsap-County-Parks-and-Recreation/129146166777">Facebook site</a>) was taken down.&nbsp;According to the article, the decision to take the blog down stemmed partially from the electronic records management advisory issued by the Secretary of State&rsquo;s office.&nbsp;See our <a title="http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/11/articles/web-20/washington-state-archives-publishes-records-management-advice-regarding-blogs-wikis-facebook-and-twitter/" href="http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/11/articles/web-20/washington-state-archives-publishes-records-management-advice-regarding-blogs-wikis-facebook-and-twitter/">November 4, 2009</a> blog posting for more information regarding the advisory.&nbsp;The other reasons cited include the need to update the County&rsquo;s communication policy to cover statements made by employees on third-party sites and the County&rsquo;s information technology systems so the County can track records created through various social media.</p>
<p><span>Kitsap County&rsquo;s decision follows a similar decision made by Alachua County in Florida.&nbsp;According to the <a title="http://www.gainesville.com/article/20091106/ARTICLES/911061006/1002?Title=County-puts-ban-on-staff-texting" href="http://www.gainesville.com/article/20091106/ARTICLES/911061006/1002?Title=County-puts-ban-on-staff-texting">Gainesville Sun</a>, Alachua County recently put a ban on staff conducting any county business using text messages &ndash; whether using a county-issued cellular phone or a personal cell phone.&nbsp;The reason cited for the ban is the fact that text messages are public records and the county&rsquo;s computer system has no way to track and save the messages.</span></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/11/articles/in-the-news/kitsap-county-parks-department-takes-down-facebook-site-in-light-of-secretary-of-states-records-management-advisory/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/11/articles/in-the-news/kitsap-county-parks-department-takes-down-facebook-site-in-light-of-secretary-of-states-records-management-advisory/</guid>
<category>Blog</category><category>Facebook</category><category>Florida</category><category>In the news</category><category>Kitsap County</category><category>Media</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Public Records Act</category><category>Public record</category><category>Social media</category><category>Web 2.0</category><category>Web2.0</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:13:47 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Foster Pepper Municipal Group</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Web 2.0 Risks:  A &apos;Tweet&apos; OPMA Violation?</title>
<description><![CDATA[<blockquote>
<p>A 'Tweet' OPMA violation?</p>
<p>Public perception counts, technical compliance may not be sufficient. Web 2.0 creates risks and challenges.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&quot;<a href="http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090618/NEWS01/706189918#Tweets.bring.possibly.illegal.meeting."><strong>'Tweets' bring possible illegal meeting to light.</strong>&nbsp; <em><br />
Twitter Post reveal a gathering of Mukilteo <br />
City Council members after their official meeting.</em>&quot;</a></p>
<p>Headlines like this recent headline in the Everett Herald hurt public trust, even when no laws are broken.&nbsp; A post on the <a href="http://openrecords.wordpress.com/">Open Records Blog</a> (scroll down to the third post) demonstrates how at least some members of the public will react.</p>
<p>To ensure compliance with the OPMA, the Public Records Act and the retention laws, elected officials and public employees must make sure they understand all of their legal requirements before they use Web 2.0 sites.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here are some additional resources on the use of Web 2.0 sites by Elected officials and public employees:</p>
<p><a href="http://citycouncilbloghandbook.wikispaces.com/">City Council Handbook Wiki</a></p>
<p><a href="http://govsocmed.pbworks.com/FrontPage">Gov Social Media Wiki</a></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/web-20/web-20-risks-a-tweet-opma-violation/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/web-20/web-20-risks-a-tweet-opma-violation/</guid>
<category>In the news</category><category>Media</category><category>Open Public Meetings</category><category>Open Public Meetings Act</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Public Records Act</category><category>Tweet</category><category>Twitter</category><category>Web 2.0</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:42:47 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Foster Pepper Municipal Group</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Web 2.0:  Staying Out of the Headlines</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As illustrated&nbsp; in this&nbsp;<a href="http://www.heraldnet.com/article/20090618/NEWS01/706189918#Tweets.bring.possibly.illegal.meeting.">Everett Herald story</a>, a Mukilteo councilmember&rsquo;s micro-blog serves to remind us about a lesson public officers and employees have been told for decades.</p>
<p><u><strong>Common Sense Advice Over the Decades<br />
</strong></u></p>
<p>1969: Don&rsquo;t write anything down that you don&rsquo;t want to see on the front page of the paper.<br />
<br />
1979: Don&rsquo;t record anything you don&rsquo;t want to see on the front page of the paper.<br />
<br />
1989: Don&rsquo;t put anything in an email you don&rsquo;t want to see on the front page of the paper.<br />
<br />
1999: Don&rsquo;t take pictures of anything you don&rsquo;t want to see on the front page of the paper.<br />
<br />
<strong>2009: Don&rsquo;t tweet or post anything you don&rsquo;t want to see on the front page.</strong><br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/web-20/web-20-staying-out-of-the-headlines/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/web-20/web-20-staying-out-of-the-headlines/</guid>
<category>In the news</category><category>Media</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Public Records Act</category><category>Tweet</category><category>Twitter</category><category>Web 2.0</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 07:55:38 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Foster Pepper Municipal Group</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Emails are forever:  embarrassing press emails to South Carolina Governor&apos;s Staff</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Emails allow an increased level of public access to government decision-making because many issues are resolved in email exchanges that 20 years ago would have been addressed in person or over the phone. These same emails, however, sometimes reveal embarrassing information.&nbsp;&nbsp; Example A:&nbsp; the scandal related to South Carolina Governor Sanford's affair.&nbsp; For more see the posts on <a href="http://www.deathbyemail.com/">the Death by Email blog</a>.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Not surprisingly, the newspaper that broke the story, <em>the State</em>, has made an extensive public records requests to the Governor's office.&nbsp;What is surprising, however, is that some of the more recent embarrassing emails show media outlets pledging support for the governor when the stories first broke that he had gone missing:&nbsp;<a href="http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/07/great_call_in_emails_to_sanfords_office_right-wing.php?ref=fpa">Great Call: In Emails To Sanford's Office, Right-Wing Media Dismissed Missing Gov Story</a></p>
<p>It's not uncommon for members of the public unaware of the scope of the public records laws, to be embarrassed when their email to their elected official is made public.&nbsp; But this is the first example I've seen of the media being embarrassed because they forgot about the public records laws.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/in-the-news/emails-are-forever-embarrassing-press-emails-to-south-carolina-governors-staff/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/in-the-news/emails-are-forever-embarrassing-press-emails-to-south-carolina-governors-staff/</guid>
<category>E-records</category><category>Email</category><category>In the news</category><category>Media</category><category>Public Records</category><category>South Carolina</category><category>Staford</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:42:45 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Foster Pepper Municipal Group</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>
