<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Local Ordinances and Other Legislation - Local Open Government Blog</title>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/articles/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 09:09:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:46:20 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>To index or not to index</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As noted in this <a href="http://crosscut.com/2009/05/13/politics-government/18993/print/">Crosscut article</a>, the City of Seattle, like many local governments, has opted out&nbsp;of the indexing requirement in the Public Records Act.&nbsp; While the PRA&nbsp;mandates that agencies have an index of their records, it also allows agencies to&nbsp;opt out by issuing a formal order declaring that it would be too burdensome to comply with the indexing requirement.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Indexing records has many advantages for governments and the public.&nbsp; So why do governments opt out?&nbsp; Because&nbsp;for any local government, but particularly&nbsp;a government as large as Seattle, indexing all of the records that are required to be indexed under the PRA is a monumental and costly task.&nbsp;</p>
<p>This does not mean all records go unindexed.&nbsp; The PRA&nbsp;requires governments that opt out to collect and make available any partial indexes that already exist.&nbsp; In Seattle's case, it's also worth noting that the City has staff dedicated to archiving and managing its records.&nbsp;</p>
<p>One way&nbsp;the Archivist could help increase access would be to assist local governments begin the indexing process for&nbsp;existing records and standards to help governments index new records as they are created.&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/05/articles/to-index-or-not-to-index/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/05/articles/to-index-or-not-to-index/</guid>
<category>Articles</category><category>In the news</category><category>Local Ordinances and Other Legislation</category><category>Public Records</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 09:09:00 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Attorney General Calls for an Open Government Initiative</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>As reported on the <a href="http://og-blogdotcom.blogspot.com/2009/03/mckenna-calls-for-open-govt-initiative.html">Og-Blog</a>, Attorney General Rob McKenna has called for an initiative to reform open government in Washington State.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/03/articles/attorney-general-calls-for-an-open-government-initiative/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/03/articles/attorney-general-calls-for-an-open-government-initiative/</guid>
<category>Articles</category><category>In the news</category><category>Local Ordinances and Other Legislation</category>
<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 11:31:46 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>