<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
<title>Foster Pepper - Local Open Government Blog</title>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/articles/</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:45:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 10:45:20 -0800</pubDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=3.34</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

<item>
<title>WAPRO Public Records 101 Seminar, January 26, 2010</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The Washington Association of Public Records Officers (<a href="http://www.localopengovernment.com/uploads/file/WAPRO Description.pdf">WAPRO</a>) is sponsoring an all-day seminar entitled Public Records 101 in Lakewood on Tuesday, January 26, 2010.&nbsp;Steve DiJulio, a member of our firm&rsquo;s <a href="http://www.foster.com/practiceDetail.aspx?display=1&amp;practice=240"><font color="#800080">Public Disclosure Team</font></a>, is participating on a panel in the afternoon.&nbsp;The panel will review the latest Public Records Act court opinions and provide insights and ideas on compliance with the Act.&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: black; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt">The WAPRO <a href="http://www.localopengovernment.com/uploads/file/WAPRO registration form.doc">agenda</a> and registration form contains more information about the training.<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span></span><span>&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2010/01/articles/cle/wapro-public-records-101-seminar-january-26-2010/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2010/01/articles/cle/wapro-public-records-101-seminar-january-26-2010/</guid>
<category>CLE</category><category>Foster Pepper</category><category>Public Disclosure Team</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Public Records Act</category><category>Seminar</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:45:40 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Rosa Fruehling-Watson</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Open Government Year in Review 2008-2009</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>The First Annual &quot;Open Government Year in Review 2008-2009&quot;&nbsp;is now available for download.&nbsp; The Year in Review collects articles on case developments and other open government issues during the last year.&nbsp; Below is a partial list of articles.&nbsp;&nbsp; <a href="http://www.localopengovernment.com/uploads/file/2009_Open_Governmet_Year_in_Review_AWC June 5 edition(1).pdf">Download your copy here</a>.</p>
<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Open Government Year in Review 2008-2009 partial table of contents:</font></font></b></p>
<blockquote>
<p><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Case Law Updates<o:p></o:p></font></font></b></p>
<ul type="disc" style="margin-top: 0in">
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Parmelee v. Clarke</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Court Holds Agencies Can Enforce Their Public Records Act Policies</font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">RHA v. City of Des Moines</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Supreme Court Underscores the Requirement to Produce an Exemption Log Under the Public Records Act</font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Yousoufian v. Office of Ron Sims</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Supreme Court reverses the LARGEST court-assessed Public Records Act penalty in Washington State history &ndash; because it was TOO SMALL:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>What agencies can learn</font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Sitterson v. Evergreen School Dist.</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Washington Adopts the Inadvertently Disclosing Doctrine for Privileged Records</font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Bellevue John Does v. Bellevue School Dist. No. 405</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>The Supreme Court Re-Affirms Privacy Rights for Public Employees</font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">West v. Thurston County</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Attorney Fee Bills Must Be Disclosed</font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">West v. Port of Olympia</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>All Deliberative Process Documents Must Be Disclosed After Decision Is Final<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">O&rsquo;Neill v. City of Shoreline</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>&ldquo;Metadata&rdquo; Is Subject to Disclosure<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal">Clark v. Tri-Cities Animal Care &amp; Control Shelter</i>:<span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </span>Is Your Independent Contractor Subject to the PRA?<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
    </li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Open Government legislative update<o:p></o:p></font></font></b></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><b style="mso-bidi-font-weight: normal"><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Articles on Open Government Issues<o:p></o:p></font></font></b></p>
<ul type="disc" style="margin-top: 0in">
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">End the &ldquo;Gotcha&rdquo; Nature of the Public Records Act<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Addressing the &ldquo;executive sessions&rdquo; question<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">The Open Public Meetings Act, &ldquo;Serial&rdquo; Meetings, and Email Exchanges<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Five Issues You Should Consider Before You Decide to Use Your Personal Email or Personal Computer for Official Public Business<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Lessons from Mesa: <span style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp;</span>Seven Tips to Avoid Being Overwhelmed by the Repeat Public Records Requester (updated 9/08)<o:p></o:p></font></font></p>
    </li>
    <li class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt; mso-list: l1 level1 lfo2; tab-stops: list .5in">
    <p><font size="3"><font face="Times New Roman">Cautionary lessons from 2009 from around the country</font></font>&nbsp;</p>
    </li>
</ul>
</blockquote>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/open-government-year-in-review-20082009/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/open-government-year-in-review-20082009/</guid>
<category>Articles</category><category>Foster Pepper</category><category>In the courts</category><category>In the news</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Open Public Meetings</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Taxpayer costs</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 06:13:12 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>To Blog or Not to Blog -- that is the question</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Last month I&nbsp;had the pleasure of teaching two classes to city officials at the Association of Washington Cities Conference in Spokane.&nbsp; One hot issue raised by the city councilmembers was the use of blogs and Web 2.0 cites.&nbsp; I&nbsp;cautioned against their use because the Public Records Act issues are unresolved.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Another topic at the conference, however, was about the use of blogs and Web 2.0 cites.&nbsp; The presenter, Lakewood City Councilmember Walter Neary, has his own blog, <a href="http://electing2blog.blogspot.com/">Electing2Blog</a>, Blogging by Elected Officials, dedicated to this topic.&nbsp;</p>
<p>When some of the councilmembers who attended my sessions cautioned about the risks of blogging created by the PRA,&nbsp; ... well here is Councilmember Neary's take &quot;<a href="http://electing2blog.blogspot.com/2009/06/funny-thing-happened-on-way-to-public.html">A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to&nbsp;Public Outreach.</a>&quot;&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here is another take on the exchange from the Olympia Time blog:&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;<a href="http://olywa.blogspot.com/2009/06/secret-key-to-why-city-council-members.html#comment-6084770935070525833v">The secret key to why city council members are told not to blog</a>&quot;&nbsp;</p>
<p>Someone has also started a WIKI&nbsp;page on the topic entitled &quot;<a href="http://citycouncilbloghandbook.wikispaces.com/">Social Web handbook for Washington State local electeds</a>&quot;</p>
<p>I&nbsp;will post the questions I have asked <a href="http://www.atg.wa.gov/OpenGovernment/Ombudsman.aspx">Tim Ford, the AG Open Government Ombudsman</a>, about the legality of this topic shortly.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/web-20/to-blog-or-not-to-blog-that-is-the-question/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/07/articles/web-20/to-blog-or-not-to-blog-that-is-the-question/</guid>
<category>AWC</category><category>Blog</category><category>Electeds</category><category>Foster Pepper</category><category>Lakewood</category><category>Public Records</category><category>State laws</category><category>Taxpayer costs</category><category>Web 2.0</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 22:58:41 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Washington State Supreme Court rules in Morgan v. City of Federal Way</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>Approximately 48 hours after oral argument, a unanimous Washington State Supreme Court issued an order in <em>Morgan v. City of Federal Way</em> that authorized the City of Federal Way to release the &quot;Stephson Report.&quot;&nbsp; An opinion will follow in the next few months.&nbsp; (The order was slightly revised on Friday -- here is the final&nbsp;<a href="http://www.localopengovernment.com/uploads/file/Order lifting Stay Morgan v_ FW.pdf">amended order</a>.)&nbsp; This is the relief sought by the City and the Tacoma News Tribune.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here is an <a href="http://www.wasupremecourtblog.com/2009/06/articles/oral-argument/are-courts-subject-to-the-public-records-act/">analysis of the order from the Supreme Court of Washington Blog </a>by EFF.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here are posts on the ruling at the <a href="http://blogs.bellinghamherald.com/politics/?p=2517">Bellingham Herald,</a>&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href="http://washingtonpolicyblog.typepad.com/washington_policy_center_/2009/06/supreme-court-orders-federal-way-investigative-report-released.html">Washington Policy Blog</a>, the <a href="http://og-blogdotcom.blogspot.com/2009/06/supreme-court-quickly-orders-release-of.html">Og-Blog</a>&nbsp;and the <a href="http://www.rcfp.org/newsitems/index.php?i=10835">Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press</a> blog.</p>
<p>Foster Pepper represented the City of Federal Way in this case.</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/06/articles/in-the-courts/washington-state-supreme-court-rules-in-morgan-v-city-of-federal-way/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/06/articles/in-the-courts/washington-state-supreme-court-rules-in-morgan-v-city-of-federal-way/</guid>
<category>Attorney-client</category><category>Federal Way</category><category>Foster Pepper</category><category>In the courts</category><category>In the news</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Public Records Act</category><category>Supreme court</category><category>Work product</category>
<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 08:09:17 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Foster Pepper in the Washington State Supreme Court</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>On Tuesday, June 9, the Chair of Foster Pepper's <a href="http://www.foster.com/practiceDetail.aspx?display=1&amp;practice=240">Public Disclosure Team</a> and editor of this blog, <a href="http://www.foster.com/attOverview.aspx?AttorneyID=189">Ramsey Ramerman</a>, will be arguing two cases on behalf of the City of Federal Way in the Washington State Supreme Court.&nbsp; Here are the issue statements from the Supreme Court's website:</p>
<p><i>City of Federal Way</i>&nbsp;<i>v.</i> <i>Koenig</i>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Open Government&mdash;Public Disclosure&mdash;&ldquo;Local Agency&rdquo;&mdash;What Constitutes&mdash;Municipal Court</strong></p>
<p>Whether the Federal Way Municipal Court is a &ldquo;local agency&rdquo; subject to the disclosure requirements of the Public Records Act, chapter 42.56 RCW.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><i>Morgan</i> <i>v.</i> <i>City of Federal Way</i>:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Public Records&mdash;Exemptions to Disclosure&mdash;Municipal Court Judge&mdash;City Investigative Report&mdash;Court Records&mdash;Attorney Work Project&mdash;Attorney-Client Communications</strong></p>
<p>Whether a City of Federal Way investigative report concerning a municipal court judge is a court record, attorney work product, or attorney-client communication exempt from disclosure pursuant to Public Records Act, chapter 42.56 RCW.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;You can download PDF&nbsp;copies of the briefs <a href="http://www.courts.wa.gov/appellate_trial_courts/coaBriefs/index.cfm?fa=coabriefs.briefsByHearingDate&amp;courtId=A08&amp;year=2009#a20090609">here</a>.&nbsp; You can watch the arguments live starting at 1:30 on Tuesday on <a href="http://www.tvw.org/index.cfm?bhcp=1">TVW</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/06/articles/foster-pepper-in-the-washington-state-supreme-court/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/06/articles/foster-pepper-in-the-washington-state-supreme-court/</guid>
<category>Articles</category><category>Federal Way</category><category>Foster Pepper</category><category>In the courts</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Washington state Supreme Court</category>
<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 08:46:39 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Sunshine Committee Delays Its Recommendation on the Legislature&apos;s Exemption to the Public Records Act ... Again</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update 5/21</strong></p>
<p>Here's a good <a href="http://www.tdn.com/articles/2009/05/20/editorial/doc4a131944ae807792906110.txt">editorial</a> from the Longview Daily News.&nbsp; Thanks to the <a href="http://og-blogdotcom.blogspot.com/2009/05/editorial-on-legislature-disclosing.html">Og-Blog</a> for pointing it out.</p>
<p><strong>Original Post 5/15</strong></p>
<p>As noted in this <a href="http://www.spokesman.com/stories/2009/may/13/panel-says-open-records-law-should-apply-to/">article from the <em>Spokesman Review</em></a>, the Sunshine Committee voted on Tuesday, May 12 to delay any vote on the Public Records Act &quot;exemption&quot; that makes most records of state legislators exempt from the PRA.&nbsp; The article quotes Ramsey&nbsp;Ramerman, the editor of this blog and member of the Sunshine Committee.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here are <a href="http://washingtonpolicyblog.typepad.com/washington_policy_center_/2009/05/legislative-records-exemption-vote-postponed-again-.html">more details</a> from the Washington Policy Blog.&nbsp; And here's a <a href="http://openrecords.wordpress.com/2009/05/18/the-washington-state-legislature-open-not-so-much/">post from the Open Records</a> blog giving the issue some national attention.</p>
<p>The vote was influenced by several factors, including that only 8 of the 13 members were present; and, a concern that some legislative records may have constitutional protections. The matter will be on the Committee's July agenda.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here are two earlier blog posts on this subject:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/03/articles/sunshine-committee-considers-clearing-the-clouds-over-the-capitol/">Sunshine&nbsp;Committee considers clearing the&nbsp;clouds&nbsp;over the capitol</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/03/articles/how-the-legislature-has-exempted-itself-from-the-public-records-act/">How the Legislature has exempted itself from the Public Records Act</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><br />
&nbsp;</p>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/05/articles/sunshine-committee-delays-its-recommendation-on-the-legislatures-exemption-to-the-public-records-act-again/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/05/articles/sunshine-committee-delays-its-recommendation-on-the-legislatures-exemption-to-the-public-records-act-again/</guid>
<category>Articles</category><category>Foster Pepper</category><category>In the news</category><category>Legislation</category><category>Public Records</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:06:53 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>
<item>
<title>Foster Pepper&apos;s Public Disclosure Team Holds Its First Comprehensive Public Records Officer Training and Certification Class</title>
<description><![CDATA[<p>On April 15, Foster Pepper's Public Disclosure Team held its first <u><strong>Comprehensive Public Records Officer Training and Certification Class</strong></u>. There was a sold-out crowd of 80 attendees from cities, counties, PUDs, PDFs, Schools, Ports, Housing Authorities, Parks and even two state agencies. From the evaluations, the class was universally popular, so Foster Pepper is actively planning to put on additional classes in locations throughout the state. Stay tuned for more information.</p>
<p>Here is the course outline. Attendees also received a thumb drive loaded with sample policies, a guide to the 365+ exemptions to the PRA, and a model public records policy in word format.&nbsp;</p>
<p><u><strong>Session (1) Public Records Act 101 </strong></u></p>
<ul>
    <li>An overview of the Act</li>
    <li>Clear guidance on the initial response including practical tips for building a working relationship with requesters</li>
    <li>Checklist for gathering responsive records</li>
    <li>Menu of what you can and cannot charge</li>
    <li>Details on e-records issues including metadata</li>
    <li>Tips on how to teach employees about the Public Records Act</li>
    <li>Includes electronic version of the PowerPoint that you can use to train your staff</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;<u><strong>Session (2) Third party records</strong></u></p>
<ul>
    <li>Tips for communicating the PRA requirements to vendors and other third parties</li>
    <li>Sample contract language to protect your agency</li>
</ul>
<p><u><strong>Session (3) Personnel Records, step by step </strong></u></p>
<ul>
    <li>Step by step process for reviewing personnel records</li>
    <li>Special emphasis on performance reviews and discipline records</li>
    <li>Tips for protecting privacy without hurting transparency</li>
</ul>
<p><strong><u>Session (4) Exemptions, exemptions, exemptions </u></strong></p>
<ul>
    <li>Review of some of the most common exemptions</li>
    <li>Focus on when they apply AND why they benefit the public</li>
    <li>Provide a roadmap through the 365 plus exemptions</li>
</ul>
<p><u><strong>Session (5) A layman&rsquo;s guide to the Attorney-Client privilege </strong></u></p>
<ul>
    <li>Thorough analysis of the rules without legal jargon</li>
    <li>Tips on black and white lines and tips on when to go see the attorney</li>
</ul>
<p><u><strong>Session (6) Records retention, creation and indexing </strong></u></p>
<ul>
    <li>And overview of the state archivist&rsquo;s new December 2008 retention guidelines</li>
    <li>Answers to questions about emails, drafts, primary v. secondary copies and other common questions</li>
    <li>Sample policies on email use and producing electronic records&nbsp;<br />
    &nbsp;</li>
</ul>]]></description>
<link>http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/05/articles/foster-peppers-public-disclosure-team-holds-its-first-comprehensive-public-records-officer-training-and-certification-class/</link>
<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localopengovernment.com/2009/05/articles/foster-peppers-public-disclosure-team-holds-its-first-comprehensive-public-records-officer-training-and-certification-class/</guid>
<category>Articles</category><category>Foster Pepper</category><category>Public Records</category><category>Public records officer</category><category>Training</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 09:07:32 -0800</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Ramsey Ramerman</dc:creator>

</item>


</channel>
</rss>